Wednesday, March 25, 2015

Student Notes

Ad Hominem fallacy: responding to an argument attacking a person’s character rather than the content of their argument.
Circular Reasoning: Someone argues the point they’re trying to make by supporting it with other reasons that are supported by their original point.
Ad Nauseum: Making the argument by repetition; saying the same thing over and over again.
Appeal to Tradition: “We do this because that’s how we’ve always done it.”
Appeal to Ignorance: Arguing that something is true just because it hasn’t been proven false.
Appeal to Numbers: Citing statistics to prove an argument
Appeal to Popularity: “All the cool kids are doing it.”
Cum Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc: “with this because of this” – just because two things happen together doesn’t mean they’re related or one causes the other.  (e.g., just because a student attends RHS doesn’t mean she has two legs)
Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc: just because something happens after something else doesn’t mean the first thing causes the second.
Red Herring: the art of distraction (“SQUIRREL!!!” or “Grumpy Cat!”)
Slippery Slope: Metaphor—taking one step and sliding the rest of the way.  Either giving away the whole argument based on one point, or applying the same standard to everyone without reason: “If I do it for you, I’ll have to do it for everyone else.”  Assuming that if you give one person/point away, you’ll have to give away the whole show.
Straw Man: Putting words into someone’s mouth (and that someone may or may not exist) for the purpose of exaggerating or distorting the opposing viewpoint.
Naturalistic Fallacy: Using nature as a reason to go from fact to value.
You Too: The idea that two wrongs make a right.  “My opponent accuses me of distorting the facts and exaggerating the evidence, but she does too.”
Begging the Question: (this is the same as Circular Reasoning, just make sure to use the phrase correctly rather than suggesting that something is “raising a question.”  Here, the use of the word begging is intended to suggest torturing a topic beyond its logical conclusion.)
Non Sequitur: Something that doesn’t go in sequence; an illogical leap to an unrelated topic or idea.
Appeal to Authority: the fallacy of asserting an idea as correct just because a person/entity in power says it is.

No comments:

Post a Comment